COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME WITH PFNA AND HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR SENILE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES MANAGEMENT: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY.

Authors

  • Kanhaiya Lal Gupta Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic, Katihar Medical College and Hospital, Katihar, Bihar, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v4i3.1091

Keywords:

Harris hip score, Hemiarthroplasty, PFNA, Intertrochanteric fracture

Abstract

Aim: assessment of primary and secondary outcome among patients treated with PFNA and hemiarthroplasty.

Materials and Methods: 20 patients each were included in PFNA group and hemiarthroplasty Patient followed. Patients were evaluated with multiple variables, complications and Harris hip score. The statistical test applied for the independent sample analysis was student t-test using SPSS version 20.

Results: PFNA groups had significantly less blood loss, less surgery time, less hospital stay as compared to hemiarthroplasty group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding to the Harris Hip Score.

 Conclusion: From the present investigation it seems that intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA may achieve better functional results than treated with hemiarthroplasty. It can definitely be a better option than replacement in elderly intertrochanteric fracture.

Keywords: Harris hip score, Hemiarthroplasty, PFNA, Intertrochanteric fracture

Downloads

Published

2020-04-26

How to Cite

Gupta, K. L. (2020). COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME WITH PFNA AND HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR SENILE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES MANAGEMENT: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v4i3.1091

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Research Articles