A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ETOMIDATE AND PROPOFOL AS AN INDUCTION AGENT DURING INDUCTION, LARYNGOSCOPY AND INTUBATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v4i12.1601Keywords:
Apnea, Propofol, EtomidateAbstract
Background: The objective of study was to compare Etomidate and Propofol as induction agents and their effect on Pain on injection, time to loss of consciousness and myoclonic movements.
Methods: The study was carried out on 100 patients of ASA grade I and II between 18-58yrs of age of either sex enrolled for this prospective randomized double blind study, admitted in K D Medical College, Hospital & Research Center, Mathura (U.P) and scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation.
Results: The incidence of pain on injection in propofol group was more as compared to etomidate group (p value <0.05). In propofol group 25(50%) patients while in etomidate group only 2(4%) patients had pain on injection. Etomidate group had significantly more myoclonic movements than propofol group (p value <0.05). In etomidate group 18(36%) patients had myoclonic movements of various severity, while in propofol group no patient had myoclonic movements.
Conclusion: Incidence of apnoea on induction was more in propofol group than etomidate group but comparison was not statistically significant.
Keywords: Apnea, Propofol, Etomidate.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
